While many view the process of documenting for services billed to the Medical Service Plan (MSP) as time consuming, it is one of the most important nonclinical requirements of a physician’s practice.
While many view the process of documenting for services billed to the Medical Service Plan (MSP) as time consuming, it is one of the most important nonclinical requirements of a physician’s practice. The Billing Integrity Program will base their audit decisions primarily on the degree of documentation in a medical record.
Recent audits have revealed that time-based fees are not always recorded correctly, as required by the payment schedule. Some fee items require times to be entered in the patient’s chart, some require times to be entered in the billing claim, and some require entries in both the chart and claim. If the required information is not recorded correctly, physicians may be vulnerable in an audit.
Below are a few example scenarios:
• If you bill a call-out fee or operative surcharge, the payment schedule requires start and end times for the service to be recorded in your claim. Additionally, the payment varies depending on the time of the call-out; therefore, this should be recorded in your consultation or operative reports as well.
• If you bill a prolonged-counseling-visit fee, you must also follow the noted requirements for the fee that are listed in the payment schedule. For GP counseling fees, this requires recording the start and end time of the visit in both the billing claim and the patient’s record, as the fee has a minimum 20-minute duration requirement.
• If you bill for a lysis of adhesions, which is a surgical time-based fee, you should also record the start and end time of the lysis procedure in both the operative report and the billing claim.
Having little or no documentation in your clinical records to support your time-based fees would be interpreted as having incomplete records, and the associated claims would be considered in error if you were audited.
—Lorne Verhulst, MD
Chair, Patterns of Practice Committee
This article is the opinion of the Patterns of Practice Committee and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board. For further information contact Juanita Grant, manager, audit and billing, Physician and External Affairs, at 604 638-2829 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org