Using population-level integrated health data to monitor and assess patients’ progression across care and treatment continuums

Care cascades

Care cascades are visual tools used to track patients’ journeys across illness and care stages such as screened or diagnosed, referred to care, treatment assessment, treatment, and status of treatment goal (e.g., viral suppression or cure). They can be constructed at various levels, from groups of patients at one or more clinics to entire geographic areas such as a health authority or province. Care cascades[1] are usually presented as bar graphs, showing stages of care for a particular disease, and the number or portion of people progressing through each stage, thereby helping to rapidly identify stages where patients fall out of care and where barriers to care progression may be occurring; determine program effectiveness; and monitor progress toward achieving desired health outcomes.

Using integrated health data

Tracking patients across disease and care stages at the population level requires integrating data from multiple sources, such as surveillance and diagnostic laboratory data, health care utilization and prescription medication dispensing data, disease registries, and vital statistics records. Data linked at the patient level are used to produce population-level estimates of care and treatment progress, which are visualized as a care cascade. Because health and administrative data already exist, integrating them to estimate these measures is an efficient method to assess care cascades, and eliminates many biases associated with other types of data sources (e.g., clinical or cohort studies).

Care cascades for hepatitis C

While hepatitis C virus infection is associated with various liver and nonliver complications and high morbidity and mortality, the advent of highly effective direct-acting antiviral medications has revolutionized its management, prompting the World Health Organization to issue global hepatitis elimination goals.[2] To monitor progress toward achieving these goals, systems tracking patient progress across hepatitis C virus illness and care stages are needed. To this end, in British Columbia, laboratory testing, prescription dispensation, mortality, and other health care administrative data have been integrated to create the BC Hepatitis Testers Cohort (BC-HTC), which contains health information on over 2 million BC residents.

BC-HTC has helped identify gaps along the hepatitis C virus care continuum,[3] such as many patients not receiving confirmatory hepatitis C virus RNA testing after a positive hepatitis C virus antibody test. These findings supported improved care-provider training, resources for care providers and patients, and a reflexive hepatitis C virus RNA testing pilot study at the BCCDC Public Health Laboratory. Having multiple data sources in the BC-HTC permits hepatitis C virus care cascades to be stratified by age, gender, geographic location, disease stage, comorbidities, and co-infections. Stratification of hepatitis C virus care cascades based on these characteristics identified gaps in urban, rural, and remote services delivery, and highlighted how well population-specific needs are being met.

In BC, the stage of care with the largest improvement in recent years has been driven by the availability of direct-acting antiviral medications, shown to improve all-cause mortality and reduce the risk of cirrhosis and liver cancer. However, the cascade of care in BC demonstrates continued gaps in treatment uptake among people with a history of injection drug use.[4] Curing hepatitis C virus among people who inject drugs can prevent transmission to others, but to improve real-world health outcomes and meet hepatitis C virus elimination goals, more comprehensive harm reduction, addiction, and mental health supports are required.

Care cascades for other health conditions

Care cascades have been used to track care and treatment progress for HIV infection, tuberculosis, substance use treatment, and syphilis partner notification. This concept can easily adapt to other diseases to improve health outcomes. However, various data sources need to be integrated and updated at the provincial level in order to track gaps in services, which in turn can inform how services are best delivered to improve health outcomes.
—Sofia R. Bartlett, PhD
Postdoctoral Fellow, BCCDC, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UBC
Adjunct Associate Lecturer, Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Australia
—Terri Buller-Taylor, PhD
Research Manager, Hepatitis Education Canada, BCCDC, and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UBC
—Mel Krajden, MD, FRCPC
Medical Director, BCCDC
Professor, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UBC
—Naveed Z. Janjua, MBBS, DrPH
Senior Scientist, BCCDC
Clinical Associate Professor, School of Population and Public Health, UBC

All inferences, opinions, and conclusions drawn in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions or policies of the BC Ministry of Health and data stewards.


This article is the opinion of the BC Centre for Disease Control and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board.


1.    BC hepatitis testers cohort, UBC Centre for Disease Control. Hepatitis C cascade of care in BC, 2012. Accessed 24 January 2019.

2.    World Health Organization. Global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis 2016-2021. Accessed 24 January 2019.

3.    Janjua NZ, Kuo M, Yu A, et al. The population level cascade of care for hepatitis C in British Columbia, Canada: The BC hepatitis testers cohort (BC-HTC). EBioMedicine 2016;12:189-195.

4.    Janjua NZ, Islam N, Wong J, et al. Shift in disparities in hepatitis C treatment from interferon to DAA era: A population-based cohort study. J Viral Hepat 2017;24:624-630.

Sofia R. Bartlett, PhD, Terri Buller-Taylor, PhD, Mel Krajden, OBC, MD, FRCPC, Naveed Z. Janjua, MBBS, DrPH. Using population-level integrated health data to monitor and assess patients’ progression across care and treatment continuums. BCMJ, Vol. 61, No. 2, March, 2019, Page(s) 78,80 - BC Centre for Disease Control.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply