A new radon guideline for dwellings in Canada--How would this affect BC?

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 48, No. 9, November 2006, Page 435 BC Centre for Disease Control

Health Canada, in collaboration with the provinces and territories, has proposed lowering the national radon guideline for dwellings. This initiative provides a timely opportunity to revisit an important though not widely known health risk. It is estimated that radon accounts for about 10% of the lung cancer cases in Canada.[1]

It is the major risk factor for non-smokers and significantly enhances the risk for those who smoke. In BC, elevated levels of radon in homes and other buildings are confined to the interior regions of the province. The new guideline in BC would not change the areas of concern in the province but would lead to a significant increase in the number of homes requiring corrective action. The BCCDC provides information on how to test for radon and methods to reduce exposure.


Health Canada’s announcement in April 2006 proposes that the current guideline level be lowered by a factor of 4. The proposal is based on a report of the Radon Working Group to the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Radiation Protection Committee (FPTRPC)[1] (see media release at www.hcsc.gc.ca/ahcasc/media/nrcp/2006/2006_18_e.html).

One issue driving the need for change is that Canada’s current guideline (800 Bq/m3) is out of step with most other countries, with many using 200 Bq/m3. In 1993 the International Commission on Radiological Protection[2] recommended that action level values be set between 200 to 600 Bq/m3.

Another factor supporting the change is the recent finding of an association between radon and lung cancer at levels down to about 100 Bq/m3 in analyses of pooled data from earlier European and North American residential studies. The work of Krewski and colleagues[3] (North American data) and Darby and colleagues[4] (European data) give comparable findings that show an excess relative risk of around 0.1 per 100 Bq/m3. The FPTRPC report[1] estimates that about 10% of all lung cancer deaths are radon related (i.e., 1589 of 15 439, using 1997 data from Statistics Canada). Further, the individual lifetime risk for a smoker exposed to a radon level at 200 Bq/m3 is estimated to be about 17% (i.e., a greater than 1 in 6 chance of developing lung cancer) due to a synergistic effect of tobacco smoke and radon. For a non-smoker, the risk is 2% (a 1 in 50 chance).

Impact on BC

Data on testing in BC (see www.BCCDC.org/content.php?item=69) show that elevated radon levels are confined to the interior regions of the province (i.e., east of the Coast Mountain range). These are the regions where smoking is more prevalent. Around 1% to 2% of the 200 000 single-family dwellings in these communities exceed the current action level. Ten times as many homes would require corrective action under the new guideline. Testing for radon in homes in the Interior is strongly recommended and a few “hot spots” have been found where it is essential.

An internal BCCDC report[5] shows the cost effectiveness of a program for testing and corrective action at different action level values to deal with BC’s radon situation. The cost to avert one lung cancer case would be in excess of $0.5 million. This information is useful in supporting public health policy decisions for adopting such a program.

—Brian Phillips, Director 
—David Morley, Head
Environmental Radiation Program 
Radiation Protection Services, BCCDC


1. Radon Working Group. Report of the Radon Working Group on a New Guideline for Canada. 10 March 2006 [submitted to the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Radiation Protection Committee]. Full Text
2. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Protection against radon-222 at home and at work. ICRP Publication 65. Ann ICRP 1993;23:1-45. PubMed Abstract
3. Krewski D, Lubin JH, Zielinski JM, et al. Residential radon and risk of lung cancer: A combined analysis of 7 North American case-control studies. Epidemiology 2005;16:137-145. PubMed Abstract Full Text
4. Darby S, Hill D, Auvinen A, et al. Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: Collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. BMJ 2005;330(7485):223. http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/330/7485/223 (accessed 26 September 2006).
5. Radiation Protection Services Division, BC Centre for Disease Control. An Evaluation of Radon Assessment and Mitigation for BC [internal report]. 6 June 2005. 



Brian Phillips,, David Morley,. A new radon guideline for dwellings in Canada--How would this affect BC?. BCMJ, Vol. 48, No. 9, November, 2006, Page(s) 435 - BC Centre for Disease Control.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply