Impact of school closures on learning, and child and family well-being

As the COVID-19 pandemic surged in the spring, BC proactively suspended in-class instruction for kindergarten to grade 12 (school closures) to delay and flatten the outbreak peak, reduce the burden on the health care system, and protect high-risk populations.[1,2] School closure is an intervention for influenza outbreaks based on evidence that children are more infectious and susceptible to influenza than adults.[3] However, the effectiveness of school closures for influenza outbreaks is not clear, and schools are not routinely closed in practice.

Current evidence suggests that illness susceptibility and transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in children differ from influenza. Children are less susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 than adults. As of 24 September, children under 19 years accounted for approximately 9% of total BC cases (but 20% of the population) and no deaths.[4] If children are infected, they usually have no or mild symptoms and mortality is rare.[5] Children also do not tend to spread SARS-CoV-2 widely, particularly younger children, including in school and home settings.[6] As a result, the effectiveness of school closures as a prevention measure against COVID-19 has been questioned.

Experiences globally and within BC suggest that schools can be opened safely without substantial increases in COVID-19 transmission when school-based prevention measures are in place, along with strong control of community transmission.[6] Moreover, the potential benefits of school closures must be weighed against the detrimental effects of prolonged absences from school. The vast majority of families responding to the BC COVID-19 survey reported impaired learning, increased child stress, and decreased connection with friends.[7] Increased loneliness in youth is correlated with anxiety and depression, which are predictors of poor future mental health outcomes if not identified early and treated. With a loss of supportive routines and structures, health behaviors declined dramatically during the pandemic, with only 5% of Canadian children meeting 24-hour guidelines for physical activity, sleep, and sedentary behavior.[8] School closures may particularly affect families of children with disabilities and mental and behavioral health needs, while existing geographic and socioeconomic disparities in educational attainment may expand.

Interrupted access to school-based resources may compound the broader societal impacts of the pandemic, making intervention more difficult. While federal reports indicate domestic violence has intensified during COVID-19, child protection reports from BC schools decreased by 75% with closures (electronic communication from Steven Yong, executive director, Modelling, Analysis and Information Management Branch, Ministry of Children and Family Development, 11 September 2020). One in seven Canadian households reported food insecurity during the pandemic, while the number of BC families accessing ongoing school food programs expanded considerably.[9] Adverse effects related to extended school closures accumulate over time and are likely to be experienced disproportionately by families experiencing social inequities (i.e., single-parent families, families in poverty, those with unstable employment and housing, and racialized groups).

COVID-19 is likely to be a fact of life for the foreseeable future. School closures have a significant societal cost and are unsustainable in the long term. Return to school, while posing some risk of COVID-19 transmission, offers greater societal, family, and individual benefits than continuing to keep schools closed. Importantly, schools are not at higher risk of COVID-19 transmission than community settings. Attention to prevention measures within schools and maintenance of strong control of community transmission can further reduce the risk of transmission in school settings. Keeping our schools open is essential for the learning and well-being of children and their families, now and for their future.
—Naomi Dove, MD, MPH, FRCPC
Office of BC Provincial Health Officer
—Jason Wong, MD, MPH, CCFP, FRCPC
—Kate Smolina, DPhil, CHE
—Quynh Doan, MD, MHSc, PhD, FRCPC
BC Children’s Hospital
—Laura Sauve, MD, MPH, FRCPC
BC Children’s Hospital
—Trevor Corneil, MD, MHSc, FCFC, FRCPC
—Reka Gustafson, MD, MSc, MHSc, FRCPC


This article is the opinion of the BC Centre for Disease Control and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board.


1.    Viner R, Russell SJ, Croker H, et al. School closures and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: A rapid systematic review. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2020;4:397-404.

2.    UNESCO. COVID-19 impact on education. Accessed 25 September 2020.

3.    Cauchemez S, Ferguson NM, Wachtel C, et al. Closure of schools during an influenza pandemic. Lancet Infect Dis 2009;9:473-481.

4.    Provincial Health Services Authority. British Columbia COVID-19 dashboard. Accessed 17 August 2020.

5.    Ludvigsson JF. Systematic review of COVID-19 in children shows milder cases and a better prognosis than adults. Acta Paediatr 2020;109:1088-1095.

6.    European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. COVID-19 in children and the role of school settings in COVID-19 transmission, 6 August 2020. Accessed 29 September 2020.

7.    BC COVID-19 SPEAK Analysis Group; Population Health Surveillance and Epidemiology, Office of PHO, BC Ministry of Health. BC COVID population health survey. July 2020. Accessed 5 October 2020.

8.    Moore SA, Faulkner G, Rhodes Re, et al. Impact of COVID-19 virus outbreak on movement and play behaviours of Canadian children and youth: A national survey. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020;17.

9.    Statistics Canada. Food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic, May 2020. Accessed 25 September 2020.

Naomi Dove, MD, MPH, FRCPC, Jason Wong, MD, MPH, CCFP, FRCPC , Kate Smolina, DPhil, CHE, Quynh Doan, MD, MHSc, PhD, FRCPC, Laura Sauvé, MD, MPH, FRCPC, Trevor A. Corneil, MD, MHSc, FCFC, FRCPC, Réka Gustafson, MD, MSc, MHSc, FRCPC. Impact of school closures on learning, and child and family well-being. BCMJ, Vol. 62, No. 9, November, 2020, Page(s) 338 - BC Centre for Disease Control, COVID-19.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

James Harris says: reply

Thank you for the article. it is most interesting and highlights the importance of in-person education for our children. I raise only one point - are we forgetting about our teachers? Are they being put in a precarious position without the appropriate protections, consideration, autonomy and appreciation? This remains my bias. The article suggests low risk on the assumption that preventative measures can be taken. Bonnie Henry has suggested in a statements that "teachers know best [how to stay safe] in their classroom". My assertion, though purely anecdotal, is that we are asking too much of our teachers without providing sufficient checks and balances to ensure that they remain safe. Who will be their voice when they feel unsafe? How can they efficiently and appropriately enact policy change to protect themselves and their families? Administrators vary with respect to ability to address necessary concerns. Social distancing it would seem is next to impossible to achieve. Teachers seem effectively neutered with respect to implementation of mask policies, and I suspect are confused as to why the policy should vary from a child in their classroom to the same child in a grocery store. While I have often found myself counselling parents who are struggling personally that in order to most effectively care for their child (our patient), they too must take care of themselves. Should we not, as a community, be advocating the same for our teachers. If they feel afraid, unsupported, burnt out, or unsafe, how can we expect them to take on the enormous responsibility of supporting, educating and nurturing our children. Thank you.

Leave a Reply