There is no sport like boxing

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 45, No. 9, November 2003, Pages 473-474 Back Page

The noble art of boxing—or, the ignoble art of scrambling the human brain

The sport of cockfighting is banned in Canada and outlawed in most other countries throughout the world. It is a barbarous anachronism. The idea of training animals to injure and kill each other in order to provide a few brief moments of entertainment and elation along with winnings from betting is abhorrent to most of us. And yet boxing, which has its essentials in cockfighting, with behemoths instead of birds, gloves instead of razors, with wealthy businessmen behind the contestants instead of working class trainers, and the human brain the target rather than avian viscera, still continues. Just as cockfighting does not demean the cocks but the audience and the bird’s connections, so boxing does not demean the boxers, but the boxer’s supporters and manipulators.

The aim of boxing is to cause brain damage. People point out that football, hockey, and rugby are all dangerous. They are perfectly right. But the aim of these sports is not to cause injury. In boxing the ultimate achievement is to knock somebody out. And to knock somebody out is to injure his or her brain.

The medical profession has thrown its weight many times in calls for the sport’s modifications and abolition. A neurologist once made me feel queasy by saying the brain is the texture of lightly cooked scrambled eggs suspended in a bony thing called the skull. His analogy underscores how fragile an organ it is despite our perceptions to the contrary.

Every year we read of some poor boxer who collapses and dies after a boxing bout as a result of repeated blows to the head. Moreover, we know—it is a medical fact—that blows to the head have a cumulative and devastating effect. Twenty years on and the commonly referred to condition of being punch drunk are all too easy to recognize, even to a lay person: slurred speech, unsteady legs, lapses of memory, violent tendencies, and the general appearance of having had a few too many. Punch drunk seems such a frivolous term to use for such an array of problems.

A few years ago the British Medical Association defined boxing “as a contest in which the winner seems to be the one who produces more brain damage on his opponent than he himself sustains.”

Over the years boxing has been made safer, not safe. Shorter bouts, less frequents contests, and fewer mismatches reduce the problems. Ironically, the introduction of headgear in amateur events makes the head a bigger target. There is only one way to make boxing safe: to take the head out of the target area. Would that not make it a spectacle of more athletic ability and skill? Supporters of the sport freely admit that it would take half the fun away.

The notion that boxers are free to choose if they wish to have their heads beaten in is inarguable. I tend to think that boxing is kept alive by the people who have a vested interest in it—the managers and promoters.

Many years ago I saw Muhammad Ali interviewed on the subject of boxing and brain damage. He gave the sweetest smile and answered “who cares about the brains of a couple of black kids? Who cares about the brains of poor kids from the meaner parts of town?”

Mike Tyson is the personification of boxing’s greatest pieces of self-justification: that boxing is a way out of the ghetto. Let us put aside the ludicrous aspect of the claim; the implicit notion is that there is a job as a heavyweight champion of the world waiting for all kids from tough backgrounds, if only they could get their act together.

Ah, there is no sport like boxing, people say romantically. No sport that produces such characters or such confrontations, such awesome contests. There is a simple reason for this. Most man-to-man sports are a form of stylized dueling with ball, racquet, or stick. The enmity, the attacking, the defending are metaphorical. There is no metaphor in boxing: it is the real thing. Boxing is real fighting, perfectly genuine violence, a pastime with the genuine aim of causing damage to the opponent. No wonder the contest stirs the blood; no wonder the contestants are fearsome, mythical men. The point is not, in fact, that “there is no sport like boxing.” The point is that boxing is not sport at all. It is violence unadulterated performed for the pleasure of millions. And millions are what it is all about.

—Malcolm Smillie

Malcolm Smillie. There is no sport like boxing. BCMJ, Vol. 45, No. 9, November, 2003, Page(s) 473-474 - Back Page.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Guest says: reply

Boxing is an act of savage or brutal cruelty. To be a boxer you have to have a mind of a killer, to win, one must put the other down even if he has to kill them.

Talisha Pennington says: reply

This could turn out to be a long post, but I will keep it brief. The main reason is the fact that it is the ultimate spectator sport- it is both simple & complex at the same time. Essentially what is boxing- two scantily clad men beating the c..p out of each other with gloves on. It taps into our primal instincts, it satisfies the primal nature that resides in us all. Even those people who maybe passivists have violent capabilities & even they will sometimes watch boxing. It is a brutal, barbaric & very risky bloodsport- but isn’t that why we tune into watch it.

It is also the highest form of combat in terms of pure skill & technique- I personally don’t think any other fighting art form comes close in terms of science. The fact that it is so simple , actually contributes to its complexity, as it is easy to learn but incredibly difficult to master- exactly like a game of chess. Out of millions of participants over the years, how many boxers can actually claim to be master boxers- very very few. So simply put there is an extremely long & steep learning curve to boxing & this adds to its mystique.

We can all relate to boxing, at some point in our lives we have had a fight & most school fights instinctively turn into fisticuffs . We often clench our fists or grind our teeth when angered- these are reflex actions, so there is something very instinctive & innate about boxing.

Leave a Reply