Am I just a number?

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 50, No. 9, November 2008, Page 538 Back Page

Mired in all the statistics that are supposed to make patient care more scientific, a family doc wonders about the significance of his daily practice.

I have been a physician for over 35 years. I have seen the good and the bad, the success and the failures. I have made hundreds of phone calls, written thousands of prescriptions, experienced tens of thousands of pa­tient encounters. And then one day in the middle of a stressful afternoon—after yet another encounter, yet another prescription—I suddenly asked myself: Do I really matter? Am I making a difference?

So I attended a UBC conference about therapeutic outcomes where the lecture is supported by statistics and buttressed by science. I heard about N numbers and P values, about odds ratios and confidence intervals.

And through a maze of numbers and graphs I felt myself getting smaller and smaller until I reached the smallest number of all, the absolute risk reduction: the absolute difference in outcome rates between the control group and the treatment group. They told me it was usually about 2% to 3% depending upon the condition, sometimes more and sometimes less. 
I sat there stunned and disheartened. I thought to myself: Is that the true meaning of my worth, the full scope of my skill—just 2% or 3%? Did that mean I had to treat about 40 patients just to benefit one?

But I also knew the numbers were not perfect; they had their own fallibility. They related to groups, not individuals. They informed me about 1000 patients but not about the one I saw at any particular time. 

And I knew that with every interaction N equals one and only one. I went back to work the next day and continued talking and explaining, answering more phone calls and writing more prescriptions. But again came the nagging thoughts, the uneasy questions: Am I making a difference? Am I just a number?

Then in the course of a busy afternoon I had one of those clear moments, like watching a patient get better or receiving a rare compliment. And in that moment I felt a certain truth about my work. 

I felt it from my patients: in the intense look of the eyes or the earnestness of the voice or the pressure of the handshake. In that moment I knew that after 35 years in medicine I was still accomplishing something, still making a difference. I am not a statistic. I am not a placebo. I am a family physician.


Dr Greenstone is a family physician in Surrey, BC

Gerry Greenstone, MD,. Am I just a number?. BCMJ, Vol. 50, No. 9, November, 2008, Page(s) 538 - Back Page.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply