Prescribing second-generation antipsychotic medications: Practice guidelines for general practitioners

ABSTRACT: Second-generation anti­psychotic medications have been prescribed with increasing frequency since they first became available in Canada in the 1990s. This is due in part to a better side effect profile when these agents are compared with first-generation antipsychotics, particularly with respect to extra­pyramidal symptoms. However, serious adverse metabolic side effects are now being reported. In addition, these medications are increasingly being used off-label without clear guidelines for indications, dosing, and monitoring. In British Columbia, one-third of antipsychotic prescriptions are provided by general practitioners. Consequently, there is an ur­gent need for primary care physicians to be aware of practice guidelines. When prescribing second-generation antipsychotics, physicians should: (1) Ensure the appropriate psychiatric diagnosis is made. (2) Consider target symptoms, approv­ed indications, and degree of functional im­pairment before initiating treatment. (3) Monitor all patients on a second-generation antipsychotic according to approved protocol. (4) Encourage preventive lifestyle practices.


Increased risk of metabolic complications with the use of second-generation antipsychotics means that physicians must monitor patients on these medications, especially children and adolescents, according to approved protocol.


Since becoming available in Canada in the 1990s, second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) medications (e.g., clozapine, risper­idone, olanzapine, and quetiapine) have been prescribed with increasing frequency to an expanding patient population. 

A study conducted in Manitoba found that the number of prescriptions increased from 9694 in 1996 to 259 376 in 2006,[1] and a growing body of literature demonstrates that this increase is not limited to adult patients.[2-5] In British Columbia be­tween 1996 and 2010, a 4.5-fold in­crease in SGA prescriptions was seen for boys aged 13 to 18 years of age, followed by a similar 3.5-fold increase both for males aged 6 to 12 years and for females aged 13 to 18 years.[6

A number of studies have found that general practitioners are increasingly prescribing antipsychotic medications, especially second-generation antipsychotics, to patients in all age groups. For instance, the number of US office-based physician visits for second-generation antipsychotics near­ly tripled between 1998 and 2002, with the proportion of visits as a percentage of visits for all antipsychotic drugs rising from approximately 48% in 1998 to 84% in 2002. 

Meanwhile, the percentage of visits involving first-generation antipsychotics declin­ed.[7] In British Columbia, approximately one-third of prescriptions for antipsychotics are being provided in a primary care setting by general practitioners.[6]

The increasing number of SGA prescriptions is due in part to a growing awareness of the side effects associated with first-generation antipsychotics. Controlled trials have shown that SGA medications are less likely to cause extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia.[1,8,9] While a decreased risk of these side effects has been found, serious adverse metabolic side effects, including weight gain, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension,[1] and metabolic syndrome[10] have been reported in adults taking SGA medications. 

In recent reports, some of these adverse metabolic ef­fects have been found in children and adolescents.[5,11,12] Furthermore, some studies suggest that children and adolescents may be at a higher risk than adults for developing SGA-related metabolic side effects.[13,14]

Given the relative risks and benefits associated with SGA medications, it is of the utmost importance that physicians carefully consider all factors when making prescription decisions. Physicians should also be aware that these medications are being used off-label without the benefit of clear guidelines for indications, dosing, or monitoring,[15-18] with some studies suggesting that up to 50% of all prescriptions for antipsychotics are for off-label use.[15

Such high off-label pre­scribing rates indicate that there is an urgent need for primary care physicians to be aware of appropriate practice guidelines. Physicians considering the use of an SGA should: 

1. Ensure the appropriate psychiatric diagnosis is made.
2. Consider target symptoms, ap­proved indications, and degree of functional impairment before initiating treatment.
3. Monitor all patients on an SGA according to approved protocol.
4. Encourage preventive lifestyle practices.

1. Ensure the appropriate psychiatric diagnosis is made
Physicians should always re-examine the primary diagnosis, as a diagnostic error could result in a chain of wrong decisions with untoward consequenc­es. Diagnostic decisions are among the most error-prone decisions made by physicians and can have a negative impact on the quality of medical care.[19,20

The Harvard Medical Practice Study reported that diagnostic errors resulted in more adverse events than medication errors (14% vs 9%), were more likely to be considered negligent (47% vs 14%), and more often resulted in serious disability (47% vs 14%).[21] It is thus imperative that phy­sicians guard against confirmation bias (i.e., sticking to the wrong preliminary diagnosis) and become familiar with techniques to reduce it.[22

The General Practice Services Committee (GPSC), a partnership between the Ministry of Health and the BC Medical Association, has developed a Practice Support Program for general practitioners that includes mental health modules for both adults and children and youth. These modules include diagnostic tools and re­sources for primary care physicians. 

For the adult mental health module, see www.gpscbc.ca/psp-learning/mental-health/tools-resources. For the child and youth mental health mod­ule (currently being prototyped), see www.gpscbc.ca/psp-learning/child-and-youth-mental-health/tools-resources.

2. Consider symptoms, indications, and functional impairment
Primary care physicians should identify specific target symptoms, approv­ed indications, and the degree of functional impairment before initiating treatment with a second-generation antipsychotic, as this will enable them to better evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment. In some cases, the phy­sician may be challenged by the need to differentiate between symptoms of an illness and an adverse reaction to a medication.[23

Furthermore, symptoms of an illness can often delay appropriate management. This can be the case with individuals who are not able to communicate effectively or who are cognitively impaired and may not be able to accurately report their symptoms. These individuals may also be at risk for adverse drug reactions since they may not fully understand how to properly take their medications or may not be able to adequately communicate symptoms of adverse reactions.

Quite often, patients with a psychiatric illness require the use of a sedating medication. There is growing concern about the increased use of SGA medications for unapproved in­dications such as sedation. Primary care physicians are strongly discouraged from using this class of medications solely for the purpose of sedation given the potential metabolic sequela associated with SGA use.

Adults
Health Canada has approved the use of second-generation antipsychotics for treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar and unipolar mood disorders, and other select conditions in adults. Table 1 outlines approved indications for second-generation antipsychotic drugs currently available in Canada, and Table 2 provides resources for prescri­bing SGA medications by indication.

Children and adolescents
With the exception of aripiprazole, which was authorized in December 2011 for the treatment of schizophrenia in adolescents 15 to 17 years old,[24] there are no Health Canada approved indications for SGA medication use in children and adolescents. However, there is evidence to support using specific medications for a limited number of indications and target symptoms within certain age groups, as shown in Table 3. A full list of sources for this evidence can be found in the referenced article by Panagiotopoulos and colleagues.[4

There is no evidence to support the use of SGA medications for major depression, anxiety, or insomnia in children and adolescents. Additionally, based on recent FDA warnings[25] and the literature review conducted by Panagiotopoulos and colleagues,[4] it is clear that olanzapine should not be used as a first-line treatment in adolescents.

3. Monitor according to protocol
Primary care physicians are in a unique position to identify early signs of cardiometabolic dysfunction related to SGA medications, and are likely to encounter such patients in their practice.[26] Due to the significant metabolic effects associated with SGA treatment, monitoring protocols and tools have been developed both na­tionally and internationally to support metabolic monitoring in both adults and children and adolescents.[27,28

Despite the development of such protocols and tools, attention to these monitoring recommendations has been low in both adults and children,[5,26,27,29] with some evidence suggesting that children are less likely than adults to receive metabolic screening and monitoring.[5]

Adults
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA) have published a consensus position on appropriate monitoring of patients on SGA medications.[30] This position notes that the currently available medications vary in the contribution they make to weight gain, risk for the development of type 2 diabetes, and worsening lipid profiles. Because of this variability the ADA/APA guidelines recommend:

• Scheduled monitoring of metabolic risk factors.
• Switching to an SGA medication with a lower weight gain liability if the pa­tient gains more than 5% of initial weight.

The initiation and monitoring guidelines summarized in Table 4 are based on the recommendations of the ADA/APA, as well as recent guidelines published by the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments.[31]

Children and adolescents
In 2011, evidence-based recommendations for monitoring the safety of second-generation antipsychotics in children and adolescents were endors­ed by both the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and the Canadian Pediatrics Society.[28] These recommendations include the use of the Metabolic Assessment, Screening and Monitoring Tool developed by clinical researchers at BC Children’s Hospital and BC Mental Health and Addiction Services. 

Monitoring begins with family and personal history taking. The family history should include questions about diabetes (type 1, type 2, gestational), hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, psychosis not otherwise specified, and bipolar disorder. The personal history should include questions about smoking, physical activity, screen time (e.g., computers, TV), and use of sugar-sweetened beverages. Monitoring then proceeds with both clinical and laboratory evaluations.

These monitoring recommendations are summarized in Table 5, and the complete Metabolic Assessment, Screening and Monitoring Tool can be found online at http://keltymentalhealth.ca/sites/default/files/MMT.pdf

Additional metabolic monitoring tools and resources for children and adolescents that are available at http://keltymentalhealth.ca/partner/provincial-mental-health-metabolic-program include:

• A brochure on metabolic monitoring for patients.
• A monitoring handbook for physicians.
• Information on BC Children’s Hospital’s Provincial Child and Youth Mental Health Metabolic Program.

4. Encourage preventive lifestyle practices 
Physicians should inform patients taking second-generation antipsychotics of the need for preventive lifestyle practices (e.g., healthy eating, physical activity).[32] A number of resources are available for adults and children, as well as for practitioners wishing to help patients develop healthy living habits (Table 6).

Conclusions 
Second-generation antipsychotics are increasingly being prescribed by general practitioners in British Columbia. Although these medications are less likely than first-generation antipsychotics to cause extrapyramidal side effects, they are associated with an increased risk of metabolic complications. 

Of increasing concern, SGA medications are being used off-label without the benefit of clear guidelines for indications, dosing, or monitoring. It is thus very important that primary care physicians make themselves aware of the appropriate guidelines for both prescribing and monitoring the use of second-generation antipsychotics in their clinical practice.

Competing interests
None declared.

This article has been peer reviewed.


References

1. Alessi-Severini S, Biscontri RG, Collins DM, et al. Utilization and costs of antipsychotic agents: A Canadian population-based study, 1996-2006. Psychiatr Serv 2008;59:547-553.
2. Aparasu RR, Bhatara V. Antipsychotic prescribing trends among youths, 1997-2007. Psychiatr Serv 2005;56:904.
3. Olfson M, Blanco C, Liu L, et al. National trends in the outpatient treatment of children and adolescents with antipsychotic drugs. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63:679-685. 
4. Panagiotopoulos C, Ronsley R, Elbe D, et al. First do no harm: Promoting an evidence-based approach to atypical anti­psychotic use in children and adolescents. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psy­chiatry 2010;19:124-137.
5. Morrato EH, Nicol GE, Maahs D, et al. Metabolic screening in children receiving antipsychotic drug treatment. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:344-351.
6. Panagiotopoulos C, Louie DC, Warburton WP, et al. Trends in antipsychotic prescriptions to children and adolescents in British Columbia, Canada, 1996-2010. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Toronto, ON, 20 October 2011. 
7. Aparasu RR, Bhatara V, Gupta S. U.S. national trends in the use of antipsychotics during office visits, 1998-2002. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2005;17:147-152.
8. Hermann RC, Yang D, Ettner SL, et al. Prescription of antipsychotic drugs by office-based physicians in the United States, 1989-1997. Psychiatr Serv 2002;53:425-430. 
9. Correll CU, Leucht S, Kane JM. Lower risk for tardive dyskinesia associated with second-generation antipsychotics: A systematic review of 1-year studies. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:414-425.
10. Shirzadi AA, Ghaemi SN. Side effects of atypical antipsychotics: Extrapyramidal symptoms and the metabolic syndrome. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2006;14:152-164.
11. Correll CU. Multiple antipsychotic use associated with metabolic and cardiovascular adverse events in children and adolescents. Evid Based Ment Health 2009;12:93.
12. Panagiotopoulos C, Ronsley R, Davidson J. Increased prevalence of obesity and glucose intolerance in youth treated with second-generation antipsychotic medication. Can J Psychiatry 2009;54:743-749. 
13. Correll CU, Carlson H. Endocrine and metabolic adverse effects of psycho­tropic medications in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;45:771-791.
14. Hammerman A, Dreiher J, Klang SH, et al. Antipsychotics and diabetes: An age-related association. Ann Pharmacother 2008;42:1316-1322.
15. Kaye JA, Bradbury BD, Jick H. Changes in antipsychotic drug prescribing by general practitioners in the United Kingdom from 1991 to 2000: A population-based observational study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003;56:569-575.
16. Mortimer AM, Shepherd CJ, Rymer M, et al. Primary care use of antipsychotic drugs: An audit and intervention study. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2005;4:18. 
17. Cooper WO, Arbogast PG, Ding H, et al. Trends in prescribing of antipsychotic medications for US children. Ambul Pediatr 2006;6:79-83. 
18. Doey T, Handelman K, Seabrook JA, et al. Survey of atypical antipsychotic prescribing by Canadian child psychiatrists and developmental pediatricians for patients aged under 18 years. Can J Psychiatry 2007:52:363-368.
19. Weingart SN, Wilson RM, Gibberd RW, et al. Epidemiology of medical error. BMJ 2000;320:774-777.
20. Newman-Toker DE, Pronovost PJ. Diagnostic error—the next frontier for patient safety. JAMA 2009;301:1060-1062.
21. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. New Engl J Med 1991:324:377-384.
22. Mendel R, Traut-Mattausch E, Jonas E, et al. Confirmation bias: Why psychiatrists stick to wrong preliminary diagnoses. Psychol Med 2011;20:1-9.
23. Procyshyn RM, Barr AM, Brickell T, et al. Medication errors in psychiatry: A comprehensive review. CNS Drugs 2010;24:595-609.
24. Abilify (aripiprazole) [product monograph]. Montreal, QC: Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada; 2011.
25. US Food and Drug Administration. Zyprexa (olanzapine): Use in adolescents. Posted 29 January 2010. Acces­sed 15 July 2011. www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm198402.htm
26. Morrato EH, Newcomer JW, Kamat S, et al. Metabolic screening after the American Diabetes Association’s consensus statement on antipsychotic drugs and diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1037-1042. 
27. De Hert MD, van Winkel R, Silic A, et al. Physical health management in psychiatric settings. Eur Psychiatry 2010;25:S22-S28.
28. Pringsheim T, Panagiotopoulos C, Davidson J, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for monitoring safety of second generation antipsychotics in children and youth. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;20:218-233.
29. Haupt DW, Rosenblatt LC, Kim E, et al. Prevalence and predictors of lipid and glucose monitoring in commercially insured patients treated with second-generation antipsychotic agents. Am J Psychiatry 2009;166:345-353.
30. American Diabetes Association; American Psychiatric Association; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; North American Association for the Study of Obesity. Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:596-601. 
31. Taylor V, Schaffer A. Guidelines for the safety monitoring of patients with bipolar disorder. CANMAT Mood and Anxiety Disorder Rounds 2010;1:1-6.
32. Canadian Psychiatric Association. Clinical practice guidelines: Treatment of schizophrenia. Can J Psychiatry 2005;50:(13 suppl 1):7s-57s.


Ms Horn is a project manager with BC Mental Health & Addiction Services in Vancouver, BC. Dr Procyshyn is a research psychopharmacologist at the BC Mental Health & Addictions Research Institute in Vancouver and a clinical associate professor in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of British Columbia. Dr Warburton is the CEO of Enterprise Economic Consulting in Victoria, BC. Ms Tregillus is special advisor and lead, Inter-Divisional Strategy Council for Interior Health, British Columbia. Dr Cavers is a family physician in Victoria and co-chair of the General Practice Services Committee of the BC Medical Association. Dr Davidson is a clinical associate professor in the Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry at UBC, head of the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry at UBC, and medical director and head of Mental Health Programs at BC Children’s Hospital and BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre. Dr Panagiotopoulos is an assistant professor in the Faculty of Medicine at UBC, an endocrinologist at BC Children’s Hospital, and clinician scientist at the Child & Family Research Institute.

Michelle Horn, BA,, Ric M. Procyshyn, PharmD, PhD,, William P. Warburton, PhD,, Valerie Tregillus, BA,, Bill Cavers, MD, Jana Davidson, MD, FRCPC,, Constadina Panagiotopoulos, MD, FRCPC. Prescribing second-generation antipsychotic medications: Practice guidelines for general practitioners. BCMJ, Vol. 54, No. 2, March, 2012, Page(s) 75-82 - Clinical Articles.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply