A new paper from the C.D. Howe Institute supports the use of capitation payments versus fee-for-service for primary care physicians. The authors point out that there are lessons to be learned from the use of capitation models, and call for a stricter and more consistent approach.
The paper says capitation makes more sense for modern-day family doctors who act more as patient managers—diagnosing, prescribing, and referring—and delivering less direct services than in the past. One problem presented by capitation is patients seeking care from a provider other than their designated primary care provider, which tends to drive up costs.
The paper, entitled “How to pay family doctors: Why ‘pay per patient’ is better than fee for service,” can be viewed at www.cdhowe.org/pdf/Commentary_365.pdf [8].
Links
[1] https://bcmj.org/cover/december-2012
[2] https://bcmj.org/node/4508
[3] https://bcmj.org/print/news/cd-howe-institute-paper-supports-capitation-payments
[4] https://bcmj.org/printmail/news/cd-howe-institute-paper-supports-capitation-payments
[5] http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=https://bcmj.org/print/news/cd-howe-institute-paper-supports-capitation-payments
[6] https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=C.D. Howe Institute paper supports capitation payments&url=https://bcmj.org/print/news/cd-howe-institute-paper-supports-capitation-payments&via=BCMedicalJrnl&tw_p=tweetbutton
[7] https://bcmj.org/javascript%3A%3B
[8] http://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/Commentary_365.pdf
[9] https://bcmj.org/modal_forms/nojs/webform/176
[10] https://bcmj.org/%3Finline%3Dtrue%23citationpop