Our role in planetary health

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 68, No. 3, April 2026, Pages 91-92 President's Comment
Dr Adam Thompson.
Dr Adam Thompson

On 22 April, we mark Earth Day. For those of us living in British Columbia—a province defined by forests, rivers, mountains, and coastline—it is increasingly difficult to ignore the changes unfolding around us. Shifting weather patterns, more frequent extreme events, and disrupted seasons are no longer abstract projections; they are lived realities. Climate change is not something we are preparing for in the future. It is something we are responding to now.

My interest in climate health began in the early 2000s, shortly after I became a father. Like many parents, I began thinking differently about the future—not only in terms of opportunity, but also in terms of responsibility. We hope to leave our children something meaningful, and that inheritance must include a stable, habitable world where they can thrive.

Over time, I’ve tried to align my actions with those values. While working in the UK, I led changes that reduced our clinic’s energy use and operating costs. Today, both of our family vehicles are electric. Whenever possible, I drive to Vancouver rather than flying. Over a year of board meetings, that choice reduced my carbon footprint by the equivalent of driving a gasoline vehicle more than 10 000 km. It also brought unexpected benefits: a calmer journey and time to reflect or work. These are modest steps, but they reinforce an important truth: many climate solutions also improve quality of life.

Unfortunately, as my interest deepened, I watched climate change become increasingly politicized. That is profoundly frustrating. Climate change should not be a political issue—just as vaccines should not be. The science is clear. The health impacts are well established. And many solutions are already available.

Climate change does not exist in isolation. Biodiversity loss is now recognized as a national security risk. Recent assessments have highlighted how climate change and ecological degradation—including threats to boreal forests in countries like Canada—can contribute to food insecurity, water shortages, pandemics, economic instability, forced migration, and conflict. These pressures deepen polarization and destabilize systems globally.

We are already living the consequences. Wildfires have forced evacuations of long-term care facilities and hospitals. Flooding has closed emergency departments. The 2021 heat dome contributed to the deaths of 619 British Columbians, many of them elderly or vulnerable. Climate change is altering disease patterns, worsening respiratory illness, exacerbating chronic conditions, and placing new strain on already stretched systems.

Health care itself is also a significant contributor to carbon emissions. At the same time, it is recognized as a pillar of national security—now explicitly linked to climate stability. Climate change affects supply chains, infrastructure, workforce resilience, and system readiness. Suggesting it falls outside our mandate is no longer tenable.

So, what are we doing at Doctors of BC? In 2021, our Council on Health Promotion (COHP) developed a policy statement on climate change and human health.[1] That was an important step, and aspects will continue to be updated as new supports and evidence emerge. Through COHP, we also encourage broader systemic change toward a health care system that is environmentally responsible and resilient.

Doctors of BC is also actively promoting sustainability by making it a core principle of our strategic plan and embedding environmental responsibility across all aspects of our work. We support physicians in adopting more sustainable practices; reduce demand for health services through chronic disease management; and reduce emissions where possible by sharing resources, tool kits, and educational opportunities for physicians. You can learn more about this work and access guides, tool kits, and webinars on our sustainability web page.[2]

The Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada has also developed the Roadmap for Planetary Health and Sustainable Health Systems for Canadian Medical Professionals, which aims to map out where we stand today, identify effective interventions, and enhance collaboration across all levels of medical education and health care delivery.[3]

But it’s important that we keep building upon these initiatives. Through our strong relationship with government, I will do all I can to ensure that physician leaders are meaningfully engaged with and included in climate initiatives. I will also continue ongoing conversations with provincial and territorial medical associations and the Canadian Medical Association, supporting collaboration and shared responsibility for a challenge that transcends regions.

Climate change is not a future problem. It is a present reality—one that sits squarely within our responsibility as health care leaders and advocates. I hope you will join me in acting with urgency and purpose.
—Adam Thompson, MD
Doctors of BC President


Additional reading

His Majesty’s Government. Global biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapse and national security: A national security assessment. Updated 2 February 2026. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696e0eae719d837d69afc7de/National_security_assessment_-_global_biodiversity_loss__ecosystem_collapse_and_national_security.pdf.
 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


References

1.    Doctors of BC. Climate change and human health. Policy statement. Updated June 2021. Accessed 13 February 2026. www.doctorsofbc.ca/sites/default/files/2021-06/climate_change_and_human_health.pdf.

2.    Doctors of BC. Sustainability. Accessed 13 February 2026. www.doctorsofbc.ca/about-us/what-we-stand/sustainability.

3.    Howard C, Marks R. Roadmap for planetary health and sustainable health systems for Canadian medical professionals. Version 2. Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. 8 November 2024. Accessed 13 February 2026. www.afmc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AFMC-Roadmap-on-Planetary-Health-EN-Reformatted.pdf.

Adam Thompson, MD. Our role in planetary health. BCMJ, Vol. 68, No. 3, April, 2026, Page(s) 91-92 - President's Comment.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Jan Hajek says: reply

It was nice to read the President's, Dr. Thompson's, comment about "Our role in planetary health"

Dr. Thompson rightfully calls out the impact of carbon emissions related to fossil fuels on the climate and the health of our planet. He makes a solid commitment to engage physicians in climate initiatives. Thank you!

Where this column, and the Doctors of BC resources linked in the references, are lacking is the omission of the importance of agriculture and diet.

For many of us, diet, the food we choose to eat, is the single biggest lever to reduce our personal environmental impact on the planet and improve our health. On a macro level, agriculture is right up there with burning fossil fuels in terms of global impact on the climate and health of the planet - especially if also considering land use and deforestation.

The science is clear - current agriculture systems, used for feeding over 8 billion people, have a very profound and very detrimental impact on the planet - in large part because most of the food goes to feeding animals, that we then use for their meat, dairy and eggs. Globally, we raise and kill over 80 billion land animals, every year - and that does not even include the millions of tons of fish that are increasingly raised and fed on factory farms.

Even if we stop all fossil fuel consumption today, if we don't change our current agricultural system, we will still generate emissions that will overshoot climate targets for temperature rise by 2°C (Environmental Impacts of Food Production, OurWorldinData.org.)

The science is also clear regarding the healthfulness of a plant-forward diet. This is where physicians should step in, this is in our wheelhouse.

Physicians should be familiar with the position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the world's largest organization of nutrition and dietetics practitioners, regarding the healthfulness of plant-based diets, including those that don't include any animal products. Physicians should also be aware that the Canada Food Guide strongly encourages plant-based diets and choosing more plant-based sources of protein and less animal-based.

As well as switching to electric cars and knowing the benefits and things to watch for, physicians should know the benefits and things to watch for in switching to plant-based diets with less or no animal products.

With respect to planetary health, physicians should lead by example, and our leaders should support and encourage us.

Yes, we need to burn less fossil fuels, and yes, we need to raise, feed and eat fewer animals.

Leave a Reply