Re: Bad booking protocol

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 68, No. 8, October 2026 | Page 272 | Letters | doi.org/10.66794/2c77

Dr Wilkinson’s letter raises a critical concern: Patients should not be left wondering whether a referral has been received or how long they may wait for care. However, individual physicians are not solely responsible for clear, effective communication, and this is not simply a question of professionalism. It is a question of how our increasingly complex health care systems can facilitate communication in ways that improve the patient experience as well as overall system efficiency.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC’s Referral-Consultation Process guideline emphasizes timely, clear communication and shared responsibilities between referring and consulting physicians. These principles are important. However, achieving them requires designing a system to support the principles, rather than simply adding more administrative tasks to a physician’s workload.

Doctors of BC’s Council on Health Economics and Policy has repeatedly highlighted the cumulative burden of administrative work. Tasks that appear small and reasonable in isolation, such as an additional phone call, email, or form, become substantial when multiplied across hundreds or thousands of patients. The result can paradoxically be less physician time available for direct patient care.

Referral communication is, therefore, best approached as a system-design problem. Patients should receive confirmation that their referral has been received, information about anticipated wait times when available, and clear instructions about whom to contact if their condition changes. But these functions should increasingly be supported through coordinated referral systems, technological infrastructure, and cross-platform communication that supports notifications, wait-list management, and appropriately resourced administrative teams. Our province’s health care system is far too complex for this to be an individual clinician’s burden.

Patients deserve transparency, but physicians also deserve systems that enable transparency without having to take on the responsibility of operationalizing it.
—Inderveer Mahal, MD
Editorial Board Member, BC Medical Journal

This letter was submitted in response to “Bad booking protocol.”

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Inderveer Mahal, MD, CCFP. Re: Bad booking protocol. BCMJ, Vol. 68, No. 8, October, 2026, Page(s) 272 - Letters.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply